Forum Replies Created

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Skewed Bridge Question – Bridge Geometry #8979
    Yilu F.
    Participant

    Return-path:
    Envelope-to: [email protected]
    Delivery-date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:46:49 -0700
    Received: from mail-vc0-f177.google.com ([209.85.220.177])
    by joe.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from )
    id 1Xh6Y8-0006UF-A7
    for [email protected]; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:46:49 -0700
    Received: by mail-vc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id hq11so5713vcb.8
    for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
    DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
    d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
    h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
    :content-type;
    bh=i0BPz3PBg6wvorxgvZEUYsgNlUzNnoXvy8JuUvQUrA4=;
    b=H/MPleIIPqg3QfZ3lbT2xlKvip7qqXcCAY2wmbLeRTuDmpcMhv67eWLnI1007cjc+n
    oMyA52GCIB+3bbOPALbYXuStGME1raA4cHxPpzOGBX/tFIh/wtyIldIeMzfQGIWg1Mc6
    z5+7D/kQvth4z2Lxt/B7euZse4Z3uinmlNyAwdOCvmvcNW8kjESKflwEZblYcUJTWsw8
    vIQzjfe0sHhvrvERIauM209pZqfATtimxI+yfhceq7PRs+SYO9KcsjqzOiCZvdEhQ7iK
    GcK/ZiPTuWjYLv7c4YUiWcSCnEhJ7QLqVn/bOaNGa72Um0bbIJQkS55uTWuinvJvAehz
    C0Mw==
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    X-Received: by 10.53.1.131 with SMTP id bg3mr877217vdd.45.1414025183477; Wed,
    22 Oct 2014 17:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
    Received: by 10.31.56.143 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
    In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
    References: <[email protected]>
    <[email protected]>
    Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:46:23 -0400
    Message-ID:
    Subject: Re: Skewed Bridge Question – Bridge Geometry
    From: Yilu Feng
    To: “Chris G. [via HEC-RAS Help]”
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134dfbcc3c31805060c6480
    X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.220.177
    X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [email protected]
    X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on joe.nabble.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false

    –001a1134dfbcc3c31805060c6480
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    Thanks, Chris!

    Yilu=E2=80=8B

    On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Chris G. [via HEC-RAS Help] < [email protected]> wrote:

    > (1) In the pier data editor, are ‘centerline station upstream’ =3D AB,
    > ‘centerline station downstream’=3DDC? Yes.
    >
    > (2) In the deck/roadway data editor, should I set ‘distance’ =3D BE or AH=
    ?
    > Is ‘width’=3DEF or GH? I usually use EF, but it shouldn’t make much
    > difference for a typical bridge.
    >
    > (3) If I set up ‘Deck roadway and abutment skew angle’=3D=CE=98, I notice=
    d that
    > the pier looks narrower in the bridge culvert editor. Not sure why this
    > is. Maybe the scale on the plot changed with the skewing of the deck and
    > abutments?
    >
    > Suppose my pier width=3Dx ft, is the pier width I see in the bridge culve=
    rt
    > editor the equivalent pier width, x*cos =CE=98? Yes, I believe so.
    >
    > If I set bridge ‘width’=3DEF, does HEC-RAS actually using EF*cos =CE=98 a=
    s
    > equivalent bridge width? I do not think so.
    >
    > Chris G.
    > @RASModel
    > http://www.therassolution.com
    >
    >
    > ——————————
    > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
    > below:
    >
    > http://hec-ras-help.1091112.n5.nabble.com/Skewed-Bridge-Question-Bridge-G=
    eometry-tp1056p1058.html
    > To unsubscribe from Skewed Bridge Question – Bridge Geometry, click here
    > <http://hec-ras-help.1091112.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=
    =3Dunsubscribe_by_code&node=3D1056&code=3DbHVsdWZlbmcwOUBnbWFpbC5jb218MTA1N=
    nwxNjMwNDEzOTQ0>
    > .
    > NAML
    > <http://hec-ras-help.1091112.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=
    =3Dmacro_viewer&id=3Dinstant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=3Dnabble.naml.=
    namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.n=
    aml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabb=
    le.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-=
    nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamesp=
    ace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=3Dnotify_subscribers=
    %21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_em=
    ail%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
    >

    –001a1134dfbcc3c31805060c6480
    Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    Tha=
    nks, Chris!
    Yilu=E2=80=8B=

    On We=
    d, Oct 22, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Chris G. [via HEC-RAS Help] &=
    lt;[email protected]>
    wrote:

    (1) In the pier data editor, are 'centerline station upstream' =3D=
    AB, =C2=A0'centerline station downstream'=3DDC? Yes.

    (2) In the deck/roadway data editor, should I set 'distance&#39=
    ; =3D BE or AH?=C2=A0 Is =C2=A0'width'=3DEF or GH? I usually use EF=
    , but it shouldn't make much difference for a typical bridge.

    (3) If I set up 'Deck roadway and abutment skew angle'=3D=
    =CE=98, I noticed that the pier looks narrower in the bridge culvert editor=
    .=C2=A0 Not sure why this is.=C2=A0 Maybe the scale on the plot changed wit=
    h the skewing of the deck and abutments?

    Suppose my pier width=3Dx ft, is the pier width I see in the bridge=
    culvert editor the equivalent pier width, x*cos =CE=98? Yes, I believe so.

    If I set bridge 'width'=3DEF, does HEC-RAS actually using E=
    F*cos =CE=98 as equivalent bridge width? I do not think so.

    =09
    =09

    Chris G.

    @RASModel

    http://www.therass=
    olution.com

    If you reply to this email, your message =
    will be added to the discussion below:

    http://hec-ras-help.=
    1091112.n5.nabble.com/Skewed-Bridge-Question-Bridge-Geometry-tp1056p1058.ht=
    ml


    =09
    To unsubscribe from Skewed Bridge Question – Bridge Geometry, click here.
    NAML

    –001a1134dfbcc3c31805060c6480–

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)