Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 36 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Dam Break #8997
    Robert
    Participant

    Hi

    This is difficult question for:
    large or small dam
    earth dam or rockfill dam

    I think, you should use all equations for breach parameters estimations. Then you can/should compare your results (parameters of dam, width of breach, failure of breach) with database of failure dams (Bureau of reclamation- 108 case of dams failure).

    By the way: i would choose a Froehlich 2008 🙂

    regards!
    robert

    in reply to: Profile Issues #9130
    Robert
    Participant

    Hi Jonathan

    Theory:
    Enegry grade line have to decrease gradually along of river. EGL or EG equals water surface head + velocity head. You would look a law conservation of energy!

    Your issue can be a result:
    – enough cross sections (Geometric Data – Tools – XS interpolation)
    – HTAB computation points (Geometric Data – HTab Parameteres: Increment=0.1 and Points: 100)

    I think, that your issue is in the HTAB!!!

    I recognize to study very good articels by Ch. Goodell (see you):
    http://hecrasmodel.blogspot.sk/2009/06/energy-grade-line-problems.html
    http://hecrasmodel.blogspot.sk/2009/02/crazy-energy-grade-line.html
    http://hecrasmodel.blogspot.sk/2009/02/crazy-energy-grade-line.html
    http://hecrasmodel.blogspot.sk/2013/10/stabilizing-dynamic-unsteady-hec-ras.html

    In the case of the next questions you can write me
    Have a nice day!
    Robert

    in reply to: Dam Break Analysis #9100
    Robert
    Participant

    Hi

    I could help with your problem, but you have to send me printscreen or the betst is all project by debug report (Hec-RAS-File)

    Regards!
    Robert

    in reply to: wall modeling #9093
    Robert
    Participant

    Hi

    You have two options:
    1. Levee
    2. Lateral structure

    I would use the levees, becasue they are simpler to work (creating, editing, removing).

    regads!
    Robert

    in reply to: Unsteady solved project #9088
    Robert
    Participant

    Hi Simone

    Is is very difficult to advice you, when I don´t see your model.
    You can send me your project using (File- Debug report)

    Regards!
    Robert

    Robert
    Participant

    Hi

    I agree with you, that energy grade line cann´t oscillate. Value E.G.elevation must decrease/fall to downstream!
    You have two resolution:
    1. Edit the crossection spacing- you have to adjust SC spacing to slope using tool XS interpolation
    2. Edit HTab ´Hydraulic Table Propertiets´ – Geometry Data- HTab param- Point (for all points set Values 100) and Increment (for all Increment Copy Invert).

    Mr. ChrisG wrote excellent article for this theme: http://hecrasmodel.blogspot.sk/2009/06/energy-grade-line-problems.html

    Regards!
    Robert

    in reply to: Dam Breach – 20% channel #9062
    Robert
    Participant

    Hi

    I was looking your model and I think, that your geoemetry isn´t correct. In the appendix I send you an example of correct gemetry (level-pool routing). You have to look a possition of objects: basin, 2 CS, dam and CS.

    When I solve dam break analysis, so I cretae a two models. The first model is solved an estimation of flow hydrographs from breach. The second Is solved a downstream routing.

    How did you estimate breach parameters: breach bottom width, failure time? Did you use: comparative analysis, empirical questions and mathematical models?
    What type dam do you simulate?

    regards!
    Robert

    in reply to: Dam Breach – 20% channel #9053
    Robert
    Participant

    Hi

    Could You send any pictures/printscreen from your model? Or you can share your project and I try to solve your problem.
    Your project can you compress using: Hec-RAS- File- Debug Report!!!

    Regards!
    Robert

    in reply to: Dam Break #8995
    Robert
    Participant

    Good day,

    You have a right, that a concrete dam failure is suddendly (Qmax=0h:0m)

    I was solving concrete dam break using method level-pool routing, because I had a limited input data (volume curve) for reservoir. (I couldn’t use dynamic routing method)

    After, you have to determine a breach characteristic (location, shape and size) in the concrete dams.

    Example:
    Location- near a functional object (weir gate)
    shape and size- the entire block as the foundation/base/ground

    Some printscreen from my project (see links)
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6wWUzbPUM0dMERpV2tvNDhTRDA/view?usp=sharing
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6wWUzbPUM0dZWxOV0dpT0ZSVUE/view?usp=sharing
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6wWUzbPUM0dT3RudGcwN2dPSEk/view?usp=sharing

    Regards!
    Robert

    in reply to: error Hec-RAS 5.0 Beta 2014-10-01 #8975
    Robert
    Participant

    Hi,

    Today, I solved this problem successfully.
    Here is a manual:
    The DLL that is conflicting with RAS is gonna be in C:\Windows\system32 or C:\Windows\SysWOW64 and is named hdf5dll.dll. Rename that file if you find it to hdf5dll.dll.backup in either one of the system folders and RAS should work.

    In my case, this bug was caused by software FLO-2D. I have notified the FLO-2D developers of this issue and are trying to find a workaround of our own before the final 5.0 release.

    Greetings!
    Robert S.

    in reply to: 99 plans? #8973
    Robert
    Participant

    Hi,

    I would try to reinstall Hec-RAS!

    Greetings!

    in reply to: examples RAS 2D #8972
    Robert
    Participant

    Hi,

    In the packet HEC-RAS_5.0_Beta_2014-10-01 are:
    – the installation setup package “HEC-RAS_5.0_Beta_2014-10-01_Setup.exe”,
    – 2 examples “RAS_50 Test Data “,
    – PDF version of the User’s Manual

    http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/misc/files/ras/HEC-RAS_5.0_Beta_2014-10-01.exe

    The exercise to load terrain model in 2d ras mapper is in the manual (page 11 – 21).

    I hope, that I help you,
    Greetings!

    in reply to: Dam break routing #8970
    Robert
    Participant

    Hi,
    I compared the volume in the first cross section vs. the one downstream end of the model, but in the volume is big dfiference. see link(apendix 1 – 4).
    https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B6wWUzbPUM0dZUJ4N0ZLT0ZZTDQ&usp=sharing

    Hydrographs 1 – 3 are a small difference, but between 3 and 4 are big difference. Where could be the problem ?

    thank you very much for you time
    Greetings!

    in reply to: Dam break routing #8969
    Robert
    Participant

    Hi,

    I was solving this problem also in LinkedIn.
    I got some replies:
    1. You could do a comparison analysis by routing the hydrograph in HMS using Muskingum-Cunge.
    2. You need to look for volume continuity between the first cross section downstream of the breach and the last model section.

    How do you solve it? Can you help me?

    thank you very much your time
    Greetings!

    in reply to: 2D Volume Continuity #8948
    Robert
    Participant

    Hi jarvus,

    i am working with 1D unsteady flow. My model is stability, but i want to check of the output using of the continuity equation.

    For example:
    RS 0 m, 781.72 m3/s
    RS 395.72 m, 750.19 m3/s

    Can you help me?

    thank you very much
    Greeting!

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 36 total)