Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 31 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: FIXED many computation errors #11854
    godzilla
    Participant

    I edited the xsecs and it is looking much better.

    godzilla
    Participant

    Thank you Chris G. I mistakingly thought the lateral inflows were for junctions. I’ll do it.

    godzilla
    Participant

    Never mind. I got it to run.

    in reply to: Edited geometry, adjoining reach WS Profile goofy #10480
    godzilla
    Participant

    never mind. I got it to run.

    in reply to: Lateral structure date exceeds length of reach #10443
    godzilla
    Participant

    The lateral structure/weir extended past the end of the reach. I edited the lateral from sta 1523 to sta 1200 and it worked. The reason it was too long is I opened it in 4.0.3 because that is what all previous files I had received had been created in. They didn’t tell me they switched to 5.0.3 and when I opened it in that version it wasn’t too long.

    godzilla
    Participant

    yea well i just figured this out. I have been toying with this for a bit now. in the bridge editor, the bank station was entered as 522.37 and in the column of stations and elevations it was 522.369 so I entered .369 and voila….

    in reply to: Lateral structure date exceeds length of reach #10441
    godzilla
    Participant

    and neve mind more, opening in 5.0.3 fixed it.

    in reply to: Lateral structure date exceeds length of reach #10440
    godzilla
    Participant

    never mind. I see it.

    godzilla
    Participant

    oh and it seems to me a flow file for a 25 year storm should work for variations of geometry. Should it?

    in reply to: DSS file creation #10375
    godzilla
    Participant

    ah thanks again AJ.

    in reply to: DSS file creation #10373
    godzilla
    Participant

    Thanks AJ. I saved the project under a new name and replaced my pond and it seems to work.
    Another question. Is the depth vs volume entry an accumulated number or area per foot? i.e. el 6 = 10 ac ft, el 7 = 13, el 8 = 16 OR
    el 6 = 10 ac ft, el 7 = 23, el 8 = 39.

    godzilla
    Participant

    Hope your new year is going well.
    I downloaded 4.1.0 and am able to run the 10 yr and 100 yr files. Working on 25 and 50. I open the plan files and it tells me what geometry and flow files were used. It seems if I pair these two I should be able to run an analysis.
    Here is something that happens I would like to change. When I run an analysis, the files are now being saved in my c:\documents and not in the server folder where the loaded files are. Can I change this?
    I had to place a copy of a .dss file in that location for one to run.
    For my 25 year I get an incomplete with the note at several river stations “Undefined values found in the time series data. The boundary data must span the computation window.” I searched help and online but couldn’t find a good explanation. Any ideas?
    I can use the same geometry file for all with different four scenarios can’t I?
    Just ran the 50 yr successfully.

    godzilla
    Participant

    Thank you for your reply. When I get back to that project I will check into those suggestions. This was supposed to be a completed model for a drainage study by another engineering company a few years ago. I don’t think they gave us the good files.

    godzilla
    Participant

    I am running the 5.0.3 and the files I have been given are from 2011. This morning I read the plan file in notepad and found the geometry and flow files associated with it. I loaded those and a dss file. It’s running. Well it didn’t finish the computations. Here is some excerpts from the report. Can you tell me what this means?

    Maximum iterations of 20 RS WSEL ERROR

    01Jan2010 00:00:20 West Diversion Main 4743 6.97 1.841
    Many more

    ****ERROR: Solution Solver Failed****

    *****Warning! Extrapolated above Cross SEction Table at: ****
    (The extrapolation may have been caused by model instability)

    Reach R.S. station

    **** Warning! Extrapolated above/beyond Rating Curve (Budge/Culvert/etc.) ****
    (The extrapolation may have been caused by model instability)

    ***** The Model Has One Or More Error(s) *****

    Unsteady Flow Simulation Terminated

    Running Post Precessor HEC-RAS 5.0.3 September 2016
    NEGATIVE AREA IN SUBROUTINE CONVEY
    BETWEEN STATION 18.87 AND 47.00
    Reach and Station
    THIS IS USUALLY CAUSED BY BAD STATION/ELEVATION DATA
    IF THIS NODE HAS A WEIR (BRIDGE ETC.) CHECK THE ROAD DECK DATA CAREFULLY
    –PROGRAM ABORTED–

    godzilla
    Participant

    yea well now I get the DSS does not exist and it stops. I’ll research that tomorrow. It’s the end of the day.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 31 total)