Forum Replies Created

Viewing 7 posts - 16 through 22 (of 22 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: leaky barriers #15247
    Chris Goodell
    Participant

    There’s no “permeability” attribute for lateral structures in RAS. If you can estimate what the leaked flow is, then you can enter that as a time series of flows for the lateral structure though.

    Chris Goodell
    Participant

    Consider using Reference Points. You may have to operate the gates using Rules though.

    in reply to: Time Series #14583
    Chris Goodell
    Participant

    The only thing I can think of is to check your layer (image) display properties and make sure the color ramp values are correct (especially the min and max).

    in reply to: trim 1D cross section up to 2D flow area boundary #14548
    Chris Goodell
    Participant

    For now, I believe you have the best way to do this is to use an external GIS like ArcGIS or QGIS. There you’ll find tools that can quickly trim multiple polylines based on an overlapping polygon, or line. I just don’t think RAS has brought those tools into RAS Mapper yet (I could be wrong…6.0 is pretty new, so if anyone knows how to do this in RAS Mapper, please comment…)

    in reply to: 2D particle tracing #14539
    Chris Goodell
    Participant

    Not sure if this is what you’re describing, but sounds like you have some leaking. Putting in breaklines on high ground can prevent this. But in general, yeah, particle tracing is a graphical representation of the computed flow directions. It doesn’t always work perfectly for every situation.

    in reply to: Instability lid sections #14538
    Chris Goodell
    Participant

    Looks like you’re modeling a tunnel with your lids. Make sure that the top of the lids are high enough that water can’t get above them (i.e. higher than the hydraulic grade line). Looks like that might be what’s going on here.

    in reply to: General hydraulics question #14537
    Chris Goodell
    Participant

    Personally, I use the average bottom elevation. But a lot will really depend on how it’s surveyed. The detail that you pick up in your survey really depends on your study objectives and at what scale you are focusing on. Near-field, localized conditions may require you to pick up a lot more detail on the bed. A reach-wide flood study: you don’t really need that kind of detail. Go with an average bed elevation and adjust the Manning’s n value to represent the type of bed material you have.

Viewing 7 posts - 16 through 22 (of 22 total)