Welcome to the RAS Solution › Forums › HEC-RAS Help › using Mike 11 inline structure data to hec ras 5
- This topic has 3 replies, 356 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 7 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 20, 2016 at 8:19 am #6059AnonymousGuest
Hi,
I am doing a comparison study of mike11 and hec ras. I already have the mike 11 data in which the gate operations values have control point value and target point values. How can i use those values as boundary condition in hec ras for inline structure.
April 21, 2016 at 10:12 pm #9852Radosław PasiokParticipantReturn-Path:
X-Original-To: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from mail-oi0-f50.google.com (mail-oi0-f50.google.com [209.85.218.50])
by mbob.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4A425D650D
for; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 10:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-f50.google.com with SMTP id x201so95280174oif.3
for; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to;
bh=rWPYB8sYJJaaxjnAfTwxmXrwAukMQgzwaNjNfubR8U0=;
b=BM7wJmUxZL+L7flGzvkz8jnHaJ/EeOKDDyjFn+Jl/SqnwGHLnge2uQUOafkPyDRCYq
LZtx638wkLm1/Hlt+ZcQ+NBdAPgplCnlKYfVI8I43FxSzjKOlIQEgUDqMDlEAdGRSp3O
NYEkCggDrN7N5uA0sXnxo6jUCG5cHHreCWWVf5mrxf7AwgCTed6pWEAzv3Od63WoBi12
Z1Lo9UlsPV0erdbmJS6KLqIND4rikP3QBTCDR3aUmvE9pCd3bcx4ZNptHqG1fo10nsvK
+a5K6tJjKswGVS9WDTZbuDkiQ5yE3VTdQs9odMzq7er8iLB58DR7vpaujozL9qcQLDzq
z4cg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to;
bh=rWPYB8sYJJaaxjnAfTwxmXrwAukMQgzwaNjNfubR8U0=;
b=T/fYGlhnXqVgy+rOsnzU2bjGYcXC3ea5B0xa4/rqD7Tv5Dcx/vVbh6f11lRtuzfo8l
okQFTP4A9u0l6RcdBo+3HdImJaW1jTTnEozrNpdNhpxUqz13HyrmW5/92G6MV04jnCsv
YhZsib7Ni6j+b2JnsquW3dTjPMoMF/7FEEDBxj5txQwPuWV8fU5UuGC9pVjtwq+jx3Jq
fFGwHGdSdHFueOFzG8vJcDAJSZYqyngV6qcOPEnVbuMQI/7xEk6eZC5oin+2XDimIPky
K74KFtKlM7VSuFOJ3fbuaVD4a2tC7m9VEYgH5Iyd9Ep9ngNy9UszDp0BSnuJ7kq72XGy
VDGQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUk2OdWr+m5/DMdYTkBfAydYvTRo6KixRQiAK3rR50v6NWYhRHRtov5986f5ZWWhlzRQnSKfku0xJgfxA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.157.57.132 with SMTP id y4mr6086212otb.169.1461262353926;
Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.157.42.34 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 20:12:33 +0200
Message-ID:
Subject: Re: using Mike 11 inline structure data to hec ras 5
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Rados=C5=82aw_Pasiok?=
To: “Ajay [via HEC-RAS Help]”
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141bb3c879308053102a73b–001a1141bb3c879308053102a73b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printablePlease, refer to the “User Defined Rules for Hydraulic Structures and
Pumps” chapter of HEC-RAS User’s Manual.
The boundary condition you need is called “Rules”. Create a variable
holding a cross-section WS Elevation (a control point) that you can use in
a rule for a gate.Good luck!
Radek
2016-04-20 6:19 GMT+02:00 Ajay [via HEC-RAS Help] < [email protected]>:
> Hi,
>
> I am doing a comparison study of mike11 and hec ras. I already have the
> mike 11 data in which the gate operations values have control point value
> and target point values. How can i use those values as boundary condition
> in hec ras for inline structure.
>
> ——————————
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://hec-ras-help.1091112.n5.nabble.com/using-Mike-11-inline-structure-=
data-to-hec-ras-5-tp2552.html
> To start a new topic under HEC-RAS Help, email
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from HEC-RAS Help, click here
> <http://hec-ras-help.1091112.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=
=3Dunsubscribe_by_code&node=3D1&code=3DcnBhc2lva0BnbWFpbC5jb218MXwtNDU2MjM1=
MjEw>
> .
> NAML
> <http://hec-ras-help.1091112.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=
=3Dmacro_viewer&id=3Dinstant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=3Dnabble.naml.=
namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.n=
aml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabb=
le.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=3Dnotify_subscribers%21nabbl=
e%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21na=
bble%3Aemail.naml>
>–=20
U=C5=BCywam wolnego oprogramowania:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/philosophy.pl.html–001a1141bb3c879308053102a73b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printablePlease, refer to the "User Defined Rules fo=
r Hydraulic Structures and Pumps" chapter of HEC-RAS User's Manual=
.
The boundary condition you need is called "Rules". Create a=
variable holding a cross-section WS Elevation (a control point) that you c=
an use in a rule for a gate.Good luck!
Radek
=2016-04-20 =
6:19 GMT+02:00 Ajay [via HEC-RAS Help] <ml-node+s1091=
[email protected]>:te" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"=>
Hi,
I am doing a comparison study of mike11 and hec ras. I already have=
the mike 11 data in which the gate operations values have control point va=
lue and target point values. How can i use those values as boundary conditi=
on in hec ras for inline structure.=20=09
=09
=09
If you reply to this email, your message =
will be added to the discussion below:
To start a new topic under HEC-RAS Help, email [email protected]=
abble.com
To unsubscribe from HEC-RAS Help, click here.
NAML
—U=C5=BCywam wolnego oprogramowania:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/philosophy.pl.html–001a1141bb3c879308053102a73b–
July 3, 2016 at 1:42 am #9853AnonymousGuestHi, can u tell me some little comparison of mike 11 and hec ras?
Something from your experience.
I should start master study about river hydraulic.July 4, 2016 at 9:07 am #9854AnonymousGuestHi Dragan,
The new version of HEC-RAS can simulate 2D model as well. The working principle are basically the same. So, if you are using the same inputs, you will get similar results. It also depends on calibration of your model. Both the 1D and 2D model produced similar results.
Good luck with your modeling
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.