I’ve been there, and it was a pain to fat-finger all that old HEC-2 data into the program. I had a copy of a copy of the original data and it was far from clear what was a 4 and what was a 9 sometimes. All that aside, there are some differences between HEC-2 and HEC-RAS that might be affecting your results, especially around bridges. The good folks at HEC were well aware of this when they wrote the program, so they provided ample documentation for the end user in the User’s Manual and Hydraulic Reference Manual. Check out the discussion beginning on page 3-19 of the User’s Manual, and Appendix C of the Hydraulic Reference Manual. I would make sure to do a detailed QC of the data you hand-typed into RAS, as it’s a likely source of potential differences between the two programs. Once you’re confident in the fidelity of your data, the User’s Manual has a few additional things you should keep in mind when trying to reproduce results. Good luck!