Welcome to the RAS Solution Forums HEC-RAS Help Re: Dam Breach Model using 2D in HEC-RAS 5.0.3: 1D/2D Flow Error Message

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #6335
    Kinagoto
    Participant

    Return-Path:
    X-Original-To: [email protected]
    Delivered-To: [email protected]
    Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (mail-wm0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51])
    by mbob.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2CA3B11B8E
    for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:19:56 -0800 (PST)
    Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id c206so186583347wme.0
    for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:38:03 -0800 (PST)
    DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
    d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
    h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
    bh=Zx+9O7v23oIHzAumkV88egA2PwMMVPBPcMU73RXN4/4=;
    b=P1zlbE2IsRIGh0hq0YGKcnLUyWxKvTfZDLGgZbr7ojrHIWaRYX/B/V8iUKO+LLPGNC
    iyA9rg5rOwIHavIIwMnyAma+yhWvFim06+i5HfeS05SZpU0c1m/LoWfEciMBTRCJSwH6
    LK0M/wBebDuMCZ40kk2Cxi+fCf+xUiM5XYDrXUuRw7yL4RGhzaatuPSfB6YyaK2qTUj+
    2+lZgcLkWw4jdCZGz69lGkC7tpsj3eu/jKf6gv1Ndiamnd5EByhK9MARqkPKyfeYr9I0
    5zSICdNgOuyUrqMCSYtyW90Y4P/e5SN2Aq3jo2GVlD99v+z13N3zHn1vQgIb1aPUe2FE
    0pIw==
    X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
    d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
    h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
    :message-id:subject:to;
    bh=Zx+9O7v23oIHzAumkV88egA2PwMMVPBPcMU73RXN4/4=;
    b=uCF+PfTNOlwW80BvIl6OQm6VfMSJ/lz8gHuKp5FGjs5aV2c078pseZRzd35CKrVTcp
    IicD/EbfR4VDpDqxsOQ9wVnps/ZnMC0LWiR1Bi+7WwXu56hOodNpZMAMnrCzgVaqQYsG
    prluwM+iHVuY45TGuoh76oEvKmhsx9nZayn1dnKkFOqG7CeNkSr3WaqJX/FVnTSU7LDL
    EHJ0f2ToIkTUSNe0W0Zul6fTJ6GreYWaIDXFu0xoZ1gJ2ReE1iISVE+VFXUaVDUOK75P
    6pWV0TnLENW7GMbveod7dEGLuCkBfqkMx1vVKjjmXBzMaY4Qrp/RGIkWyCP0SfOy3ceS
    5N/w==
    X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKmHRS1zBg06xN4TFt9slBkSwb5Vzo4iJhd4WPwdKNDJtuL0721W00ZGZY1Lm/C0myR+YjfnPgpbdxEfg==
    X-Received: by 10.28.232.90 with SMTP id f87mr15012740wmh.35.1485225481993;
    Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:38:01 -0800 (PST)
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Received: by 10.28.213.76 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:38:00 -0800 (PST)
    Received: by 10.28.213.76 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:38:00 -0800 (PST)
    In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
    References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
    From: Kinagoto Nanadoum
    Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 21:38:00 -0500
    Message-ID:
    Subject: Re: Dam Breach Model using 2D in HEC-RAS 5.0.3: 1D/2D Flow Error Message
    To: “cameron [via HEC-RAS Help]”
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1147c6c84403d60546ce01e0

    –001a1147c6c84403d60546ce01e0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    Hello Cameron,

    I am running a dam beach simulation on a very long reach, about 18 miles.
    My desktop is not power enough to run the simulation faster (3 to 5 hours)
    including warm up time. Are you aware of any free or cheap fast web super
    computing possibility?
    Thanks,
    Nan
    On Jan 5, 2017 10:01 AM, “cameron [via HEC-RAS Help]” < [email protected]> wrote:

    > This message is stating that there is an error of that much flow across
    > your 1D/2D connection. To fix this, you either need to adjust the
    > connection or increase the 1D/2D iterations to 20 if not done so already.
    >
    > ——————————
    > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
    > below:
    > http://hec-ras-help.1091112.n5.nabble.com/Dam-Breach-
    > Model-using-2D-in-HEC-RAS-5-0-3-1D-2D-Flow-Error-Message-tp3480p3485.html
    > To unsubscribe from Dam Breach Model using 2D in HEC-RAS 5.0.3: 1D/2D Flo=
    w
    > Error Message, click here
    > <http://hec-ras-help.1091112.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=
    =3Dunsubscribe_by_code&node=3D3480&code=3Da2luYWdvdG9AZ21haWwuY29tfDM0ODB8N=
    jE1MjE5MTkx>
    > .
    > NAML
    > <http://hec-ras-help.1091112.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=
    =3Dmacro_viewer&id=3Dinstant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=3Dnabble.naml.=
    namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.v=
    iew.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=3Dnotify_subscribers%21nabble%3A=
    email.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble=
    %3Aemail.naml>
    >

    –001a1147c6c84403d60546ce01e0
    Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    Hello Cameron,

    I am running a dam beach simulation on a very long reach, ab=
    out 18 miles. My desktop is not power enough to run the simulation faster (=
    3 to 5 hours) including warm up time. Are you aware of any free or cheap fa=
    st web super computing possibility?
    Thanks,
    Nan

    On Jan 5, 2017 10:01 AM, "cameron [via HEC-=
    RAS Help]" <[email protected]> wrote:

    -left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

    This message is stating that there is an error of that much flow across yo=
    ur 1D/2D connection. To fix this, you either need to adjust the connection =
    or increase the 1D/2D iterations to 20 if not done so already.

    =09
    =09
    =09


    If you reply to this email, your message =
    will be added to the discussion below:

    http://hec-ras-help.1091112.n5.nabble.com/Dam-Breach-Mod=
    el-using-2D-in-HEC-RAS-5-0-3-1D-2D-Flow-Error-Message-tp3480p3485=
    .html


    =09
    To unsubscribe from Dam Breach Model using 2D in HEC-RAS 5.0.3: 1D/2D Fl=
    ow Error Message, click he=
    re
    .
    NAML

    –001a1147c6c84403d60546ce01e0–

    #10355
    Lonnie A
    Participant

    I don’t have any experience with this but I believe you might be able to purchase super computer time from Amazon?
    https://aws.amazon.com/hpc/

    #10356
    Kinagoto
    Participant

    Thanks, Leonnie.

    I will check it out.

    #10357
    cameron
    Participant

    For dam breach simulations, you can usually get away with larger grid cells as long as you include breaklines. By using larger grid cells, this should help with the run times.

    3 to 5 hours is normal for 2D modeling depending on the size of models. Most models I run require 10-20 hours if not more as they require either a large area or lots of detail. Not sure what type of machine you have, but more cores is not always better. I seen models where a few cores is faster than over 20, but it all depends on the project.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.