Welcome to the RAS Solution Forums HEC-RAS Help modeling a river passing wetlands

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #6633
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I am modeling a river reach flowing through an area of wetland, and now the hard part for me is, how to model the water exchange (through surface flow) between the wetland and the river channel. I read some discussions here, and I find there might be two alternatives:

    First, to extend the river cross sections in the landward direction, so the wetland on both sides of the river can be modeled as floodplains.

    My understanding is, this is still a 1D type of model since it doesn’t model the water between the cross sections directly, which is fine since my main purpose is to model the water in the channel. And the modeled water flow to the wetland might highly rely on the topography data of the wetland.

    My question is how far should the cross section go inland? 100 m? 500 m? Do we need any boundary condition on the inland boundary?

    Second, to model the wetland as water storage. But the question is, how many storage areas do we need to model the continuous wetlands on both sides of the channel?

    I don’t know if there are any better options. Your comments are very appreciated!

    #10915
    Chad Ballard
    Participant

    How about modeling the wetland as a 2D domain with 1D elements as inflow and outflow of the 2D domain?

    #10916
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Hi, Chad,

    Thanks for your reply! If I understand correctly, you were saying I can model the whole area, including the river and the adjacent wetland, in a 2D model and treat the inlet/outlet of the river channel as inflow/outflow boundary condition?

    That is a great idea and I think I will do it ultimately. But as we know, there are water flow in the wetlands through either the channel or the surface flow. At the point, I am lack of measurement data to quantify the water flow in the wetlands (as a boundary condition for the wetland in the model domain).

    That’s why I am more focusing on finding a proper 1d representation of the 2D flow (in reality). I don’t know if it makes sense or not, but any comments are very welcome.

    Thank you!

    Kevin

    #10917
    Chad Ballard
    Participant

    This is kind of what is going on in my head.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.