Welcome to the RAS Solution Forums HEC-RAS Help Import and cross section interpolation

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #5375
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Hi everybody,

    My name is Nils and I am working as a hydrologist in Norway.

    I would like to ask you some quite basic questions about cross section interpolations, for example how are you usually importing and interpolating cross sections?

    I usually follow these steps:
    – Create banks, river, flowpaths and cross sections in GeoHEC-RAS
    – Import data in HEC-RAS
    – Import bathymetry data as .csv files in HEC-RAS
    – Merge cross section data and bathymetry data at every cross section
    – Interpolate between cross sections with Cut Line GIS (linear)

    The problem is that there are sometimes quite long distances between cross sections. And when I used “Linearly interpolate cut line from bounding XS’s….” the interpolation does not take into account of bank lines. Then I get this results : https://www.dropbox.com/s/rp80qtrqm47t46m/problem.JPG

    What is the best way to go around this problem?
    Should I define all the cross sections in GeoHEC-RAS? (but then I will only have elevation from the contour lines, and I will not have the possibility to interpolate in HEC-RAS in between cross sections with actual bathymetry data)

    Second question:

    – I am working now with a project where we only manage to get 15 cross sections for a 6 km long river. The river has a quite flat bed channel. I decided to add additional cross sections as a rectangular channel in the model. Will this cause high instabilities in low/middle flow studies (for unsteady)? Should I represent it as a parabolic channel to avoid this problem?

    I hope I did not confuse everybody with my french/norwegian/english.

    #8613
    Anonymous
    Guest
    #8614
    Chris G.
    Keymaster

    Hi Nils-

    Ideally, you’d get a few more from GIS (enough so that interpolation doesn’t give you this problem). But if you don’t want to do that, when interpolating, try using the feature “Generate for display as perpendicular segments to reach invert” in the “Cut Line GIS Coordinates” pane of the Interpolation window. That will keep the cross sections’ inverts on the stream centerline. The geopositioning might not be perfect, but neither is the other method and they are, after all, interpolated cross sections.

    Second Question: It could cause instabilities, but I’d also be worried about inaccuracies (even if you get it stable). If you have to go that route though, better not to use wide flat-bottomed cross sections-they tend to cause stability problems. Parabolic would work, or even easier, just give the rectangle an invert point in the middle that is slightly lower than the end points. You are correct that the higher the stages, the less of an issue this becomes.
    Good Luck-
    Chris
    @RASModel

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.