Welcome to the RAS Solution Forums HEC-RAS Help Help with errors from dam breach model

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #5840
    mgil2015
    Participant

    Hello everyone,

    I am attempting to run a dam breach model (unsteady flow) in HEC-RAS 4.1.0, but I continue to get the following errors. I have tried many things to stabilize my reach but nothing seems to work.

    Is anyone able to decipher these error messages for me?

    Thank you!

    “Geometric Preprocessor Version 4.1.0 Jan 2010
    1 Internal Boundary curve(s) have been read in and will not be recalculated

    Finished Processing Geometry

    Performing Unsteady Flow Simulation Version 4.1.0 Jan 2010

    **** Solution Solver Failed ****

    Minimum error exceeds allowable tolerance at 21SEP2008 2400

    LostPond Upper 1201.299
    WARNING!

    ***** Extrapolated above Cross Section Table at: *****

    LostPond Upper R.S. 1201.299
    LostPond Upper R.S. 1151.40*
    LostPond Upper R.S. 1101.51
    LostPond Upper R.S. 917.3005

    Finished Unsteady Flow Simulation

    Writing Results to DSS
    Finished Writing Results to DSS

    Reading Data for Post Process
    Simulation went unstable at: 22Sep2008 00:00:10
    Resetting post process profiles to end at: 21SEP2008 2400

    Running Post Processor Version 4.1.0 Jan 2010

    Finished Post Processing

    Task Time
    Preprocessing Geometry 0.14 sec
    Unsteady Flow Computations 2.36 sec
    Writing to DSS 0.70 sec
    Post-Processing 0.52 sec
    Complete Process 3.73 sec
    Computation messages written to: x:\Clients\State\R-03887_2014_Western_District_Dam_Inspections\Lost Pond Dam\EAP_LimitsOfPotentialFlooding\HEC-RAS\FloodInundation.p02.comp_msgs.txt”

    #9449
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Suggest that you look at HEC-TD-39 for info. on applying HEC-RAS to dam breach modeling. From the errors that you are seeing, I suspect that the initial conditions are bad. To start the model there must be finite depth everywhere. Also, the extrapolation errors are a clue. Check that the tables of hydraulic parameters cover the expected extent of the water surface elevation at all computation points – including the reservoir (if you are using unsteady routing there). Then, address the issues of time step and other computational parameters.

    #9450
    mgil2015
    Participant

    Yes the TD-39 paper has been a big help, thank you for your advice! I also have found that adjusting the time step makes a big difference when it comes to stability.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.