Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 26 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #5773
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Hi everyone,

    I’m working on a project that involves the calculation of the 50 year flood height so what I am trying to do is create the geometry data in GEO-RAS and export it to HEC-RAS to run the model with the flow I got for that return period. I also got the mean flow. The problem I am having is when I export the data in HEC-RAS everything seems to be right but when I compute the plan the results for the WS Elev doesn’t make any sense. It’s really weird because if I put a really low flow the floodplain is completely full. Someone could shed light on this? what am I missing? I would much appreciate any help, it’s driving me crazy.

    Many thanks in advance.

    Laura Lozano

    #9248
    jadams
    Participant

    Make sure all the fields exported out of Geo-Ras correctly. Make special note of the the downstream lengths and manning’s n values. Sometimes these will not export as anticipated or you may have forgotten the appropriate GIS fields for them to export.

    #9249
    neeyole
    Participant

    Thanks Jadams for your response. I put manning’s values manually and the rest of the inputs seems to be ok. The strangest thing is that there is no much difference is I put a tiny flow or a huge one. The floodplain is completely full!.

    Many thanks

    #9250
    cameron
    Participant

    what did you set for your downstream boundary? Is the floodplain lower than the channel (channel bounded by levees)? Maybe if you post a picture or the files it might help.

    #9251
    neeyole
    Participant

    Hi Cameron,

    Thanks a lot for your reply.

    I run the program with a mixed flow regime since I got changes in the slopes. So I set a Normal Depth for upstream and dowmstrean of 0.01. I also run the program with a Critical Depth but it didn’t work either. Attached there is a snapshot of my cannel with a flow of 18.4 m3/s. But if I change the flow for the 50 year flow event (That is considerably bigger than the mean flow (594.4 m3/s) is almost the same.
    Only to make sure, when you digitalize the river and Banks line as well as the flowpath in GeoRas is always from upstream to downstrem right?

    Many thanks for your interest at least is nice to share it!

    #9252
    cameron
    Participant

    What do your cross-sections look like? It would be easier if you posted your files and I could take a look.

    #9253
    neeyole
    Participant

    There you go the geometry I imported with Geo-Ras and the Project in HEC-RAS. I had to modify all the Banks but I am not sure if I did it right.

    Many many thanks Cameron, if I can help with something let me know.
    Nueva_carpeta.zip

    #9254
    cameron
    Participant

    There was no geometry file attached so I imported in the Geo-RAS file. If you look at the profile, the river is going in the wrong direction. Station 100 (west end of model) should be the upstream end of the model.

    #9255
    neeyole
    Participant

    I was seeing that something was wrong with the profile but I just assumed that the direccion I was told was the right one? thanks for that Cameron. Just one more thing, regarding the bank channel should I stick to the points I get when I digitalize them according to the reality or modify them in HEC-Ras?
    Many thanks for your help

    #9256
    cameron
    Participant

    In general I digitize them and then move them in HEC-RAS to what makes sense if it does not look correct in HEC-RAS. I also check in profile view the bank elevations to make sure they are consistent. Some people recommend placing the banks at bankfull flow which some say is around the 2 to 5-yr flood event or 20% of the 100-yr flood event.

    #9257
    neeyole
    Participant

    Sorry for the obviousness of the question but when you say that you check the Banks elevations in profile view to make sure they are consisten, what do you mean by consisten?

    #9258
    cameron
    Participant

    That the bank elevations don’t jump up or down a lot from one cross-section to the next.

    #9259
    neeyole
    Participant

    Thanks a lot Cameron! I already redid it and it makes sense now! I just hope not to have more silly problems!
    Thank you again I really appreciate your help

    Laura

    #9260
    neeyole
    Participant

    Hi,

    Just one more thing if you could. I am working on the bank lines now to make sure they are consisten and I was in doubt since accordingly Arcgis the bank point should be where the red spots are but It doesn’t make any sense. If I establish them relying on the 2-5 year flood height they will be out of the main channel. What should I do? any suggestion?

    Many thanks

    #9261
    cameron
    Participant

    What is your topographic data based on? Does it have really good resolution to pick up the channel? Does the imagery line up with the topographic data?

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 26 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.