Welcome to the RAS Solution › Forums › HEC-RAS Help › Dam break routing
- This topic has 3 replies, 361 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 1 month ago by Robert.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 9, 2014 at 2:05 am #5606RobertParticipant
Hi
I am solving dam break routing for the earth dams.
I computed a hydrographs for dam break shape on the software BREACH, there is a peak flow 24710 cf3/s in time 3h0m. In the end CrossSection (0) is the peak flow 17650 cf3/s in time 8h30m. My solved area is long 12.4 miles.Question:
Can you be decrease peak flow only abou 10590 ft3/s for the distance 12.4 miles?Notice, my unsteady model is stabilized !!!
thank you very much
Greetings!October 9, 2014 at 5:05 am #8968Chris G.KeymasterReturn-path:
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 17:06:03 -0700
Received: from mail-oi0-f41.google.com ([209.85.218.41])
by joe.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from)
id 1Xc1F0-0002R5-6f
for [email protected]; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 17:06:03 -0700
Received: by mail-oi0-f41.google.com with SMTP id u20so346583oif.14
for; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 17:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=subject:references:from:content-type:in-reply-to:message-id:date:to
:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
bh=Lbv0Zz4oit3gqBu8Ghs39ufA365nHTPy/n2aMiIf0H0=;
b=O57D2jt0KSP2XSAEyZv48Ywk4OLJC7r5UmActvH7xB9Q8BkLxMIKgmcILjgPuunajP
HrH8qVHgT/LSdSneWW8cvxE0a2JuIFe/yYkyDJFZbEoRR9UEnHi3Dh8equKK2nffzOpP
hUnhfwv7PqtnvYZG+1bgEcIxLqgFcviEh75Vsj5cm4hNvGiLvRfMZ3mv0K194BIFgZk2
tZFJxu2O8fbiuSN1C+BWBHL1wQP4TBsq8AJVrn2Fv8VqK5qYLKHs1IsUhdxzSUtZZT4D
1ZTUObMdsmDTGBuuhu1UCklTPZf5Qv7oDo1Cc2vBVUsQQUD3f2N3W/MZDMkMGh0yxmKZ
tAWQ==
X-Received: by 10.182.233.132 with SMTP id tw4mr16722965obc.25.1412813137952;
Wed, 08 Oct 2014 17:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:100f:b126:7a5b:3da4:5b3c:eaa6:b994? ([2600:100f:b126:7a5b:3da4:5b3c:eaa6:b994])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j8sm1264324oeq.11.2014.10.08.17.05.36
for
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Wed, 08 Oct 2014 17:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Dam break routing
References: <[email protected]>
From: The RAS SolutionContent-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=Apple-Mail-579CE983-089C-4F88-A110-AC500D83ECBB
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12A405)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 17:05:33 -0700
To: “RobertS [via HEC-RAS Help]”
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.218.41
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [email protected]
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on joe.nabble.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false–Apple-Mail-579CE983-089C-4F88-A110-AC500D83ECBB
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printableYes, especially if it’s a fairly confined reach(ie like a canyon).=20
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 8, 2014, at 2:05 PM, RobertS [via HEC-RAS Help]
wrote:
>=20
> Hi=20
>=20
> I am solving dam break routing for the earth dams.=20
> I computed a hydrographs for dam break shape on the software BREACH, there=
is a peak flow 24710 cf3/s in time 3h0m. In the end CrossSection (0) is the=
peak flow 17650 cf3/s in time 8h30m. My solved area is long 12.4 miles.=20
>=20
> Question:=20
> Can you be decrease peak flow only abou 10590 ft3/s for the distance 12.4 m=
iles?=20
>=20
> Notice, my unsteady model is stabilized !!!=20
>=20
> thank you very much=20
> Greetings!=20
>=20
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion b=
elow:
> http://hec-ras-help.1091112.n5.nabble.com/Dam-break-routing-tp1021.html
> To unsubscribe from HEC-RAS Help, click here.
> NAML–Apple-Mail-579CE983-089C-4F88-A110-AC500D83ECBB
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bitYes, especially if it’s a fairly confined reach(ie like a canyon).Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 8, 2014, at 2:05 PM, RobertS [via HEC-RAS Help] <[email protected]> wrote:Hi
I am solving dam break routing for the earth dams.
I computed a hydrographs for dam break shape on the software BREACH, there is a peak flow 24710 cf3/s in time 3h0m. In the end CrossSection (0) is the peak flow 17650 cf3/s in time 8h30m. My solved area is long 12.4 miles.Question:
Can you be decrease peak flow only abou 10590 ft3/s for the distance 12.4 miles?Notice, my unsteady model is stabilized !!!
thank you very much
Greetings!
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:http://hec-ras-help.1091112.n5.nabble.com/Dam-break-routing-tp1021.html
To unsubscribe from HEC-RAS Help, click here.
NAML
–Apple-Mail-579CE983-089C-4F88-A110-AC500D83ECBB–October 9, 2014 at 11:26 pm #8969RobertParticipantHi,
I was solving this problem also in LinkedIn.
I got some replies:
1. You could do a comparison analysis by routing the hydrograph in HMS using Muskingum-Cunge.
2. You need to look for volume continuity between the first cross section downstream of the breach and the last model section.How do you solve it? Can you help me?
thank you very much your time
Greetings!October 12, 2014 at 1:18 am #8970RobertParticipantHi,
I compared the volume in the first cross section vs. the one downstream end of the model, but in the volume is big dfiference. see link(apendix 1 – 4).
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B6wWUzbPUM0dZUJ4N0ZLT0ZZTDQ&usp=sharingHydrographs 1 – 3 are a small difference, but between 3 and 4 are big difference. Where could be the problem ?
thank you very much for you time
Greetings! -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.